• English
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
  • español 
    • English
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   COVID-19
  • Resources in English
  • Technical documents and research evidence on COVID-19
  • Ver ítem
  •   COVID-19
  • Resources in English
  • Technical documents and research evidence on COVID-19
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Advocacy Interventions to Reduce or Eliminate Violence and Promote the Physical and Psychosocial Well‐Being of Women who Experience Intimate Partner Abuse: A Systematic Review

 
Thumbnail
Fecha
2016-01-04
Autor
Rivas, Carol et. al.
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Resumen
This Campbell systematic review assesses the effects of advocacy interventions on intimate partner violence and women's wellbeing. The review summarizes findings from 13 studies. Physical abuse: After one year, brief advocacy had no effect in two healthcare studies and one community study, but it reduced minor abuse in one antenatal care study. Another antenatal study showed reduced abuse immediately after brief advocacy, but women were also treated for depression, which may have affected results. Two studies provided weak evidence that intensive advocacy reduces physical abuse up to two years after the intervention. Sexual abuse was reported in four studies that found no effects. Emotional abuse: One antenatal care study reported reduced emotional abuse at 12 months after advocacy. Depression: Brief advocacy prevented depression in abused women attending healthcare services and pregnant women immediately after advocacy. Intensive advocacy did not reduce depression in shelter women followed up at 12 and 24 months. The moderate‐to‐low quality evidence came mostly from studies with a low risk of bias. Quality of life: Three trials of brief advocacy trials no benefit on quality of life. Intensive advocacy showed a weak benefit in two studies in domestic violence shelters/refuges, and a primary care study showed improved motivation to do daily tasks immediately after advocacy.
URI
https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2016.2
Colecciones
  • Technical documents and research evidence on COVID-19

Lista

TodoComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosCategoríaMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosCategoríaMaterias

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Organización Panamericana de la Salud
Organización Mundial de la Salud. Oficina Regional para las Américas
525 Twenty-third Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, Estados Unidos de América

Notas importantes sobre el material (Disclaimer)

Links

  • OMS Brote de enfermedad por coronavirus
  • OPS Enfermedad por el Coronavirus
  • OPS/BIREME Vitrina de Conocimiento COVID-19

  • Biblioteca Digital de la OPS (IRIS PAHO)
  • Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (BVS)
  • Global Index Medicus (GIM)