Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAllen, Claire
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-24T20:05:44Z
dc.date.available2020-03-24T20:05:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-19
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.evidenceaid.org/liberal-versus-conservative-fluid-therapy-in-children-and-adults-with-sepsis-or-septic-shock/en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12663/783
dc.description.abstractWhat is this? Sepsis and septic shock are life-threatening complications of infection. Fluid therapy, either conservative or liberal, is used during its initial treatment. This may have relevance for the treatment of some critically ill patients with COVID-19. In this Cochrane systematic review, the authors searched for randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing liberal fluid therapy versus conservative fluid therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock. They did not restrict their searches by date or language of publication and did these in January 2018. They identified 3 randomized trials in children (3402 participants) and were able to use data from 2 of these (3288 participants). The tested therapies varied across the trials. They found no trials in adults.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectFluid Therapyen_US
dc.subjectAdults Healthen_US
dc.subjectChild Healthen_US
dc.subjectSepsisen_US
dc.subjectShock, Septicen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.titleLiberal versus conservative fluid therapy in children and adults with sepsis or septic shocken_US
eihealth.countryOthersen_US
eihealth.categoryClinical characterization and managementen_US
eihealth.typePublished Articleen_US
eihealth.maincategoryProtect Health Care Workers / Proteger la Salud de los Trabajadoresen_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEvidence Aiden_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record