Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorGardner, Lauren M
dc.contributor.authorChen, Nan
dc.contributor.authorSarkar, Sahotra
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-05T20:42:57Z
dc.date.available2022-09-05T20:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(16)00176-6/fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12663/2984
dc.description.abstractConstância F J Ayres1 recently pointed out that Zika virus has been collected from several mosquito species including those from the genera, Anopheles, Culex, and Mansonia besides Aedes. Moreover, at least ten Aedes species are known to harbour Zika virus. However, the presence of the virus does not automatically make the species an efficient vector for the disease. It is, therefore, unfortunate that a recent risk map published in The Lancet considers Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus together.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectZika Research Projecten_US
dc.subjectZika Virusen_US
dc.subjectZika Virus Infectionen_US
dc.titleGlobal risk of Zika virus depends critically on vector status of Aedes albopictusen_US
eihealth.countryOthersen_US
eihealth.categoryEpidemiology and epidemiological studiesen_US
eihealth.typeResearch protocol informationen_US
eihealth.maincategorySave Lives / Salvar Vidasen_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalThe Lanceten_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameAustralia. University of New South Walesen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversity of Texasen_US


Arquivos deste item

ArquivosTamanhoFormatoVisualização

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Mostrar registro simples