Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOrsborne, James
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Sarah DeRaedt
dc.contributor.authorHendy, Adam
dc.contributor.authoret al.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-04T02:20:40Z
dc.date.available2022-09-04T02:20:40Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152805en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12663/2873
dc.description.abstractBackground The dengue and Zika viruses are primarily transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, which are most active during day light hours and feed both in and outside of the household. Personal protection technologies such as insecticide-treated clothing could provide individual protection. Here we assessed the efficacy of permethrin-treated clothing on personal protection in the laboratory. Methods The effect of washing on treated clothing, skin coverage and protection against resistant and susceptible Ae. aegypti was assessed using modified WHO arm-in-cage assays. Coverage was further assessed using free-flight room tests to investigate the protective efficacy of unwashed factory-dipped permethrin-treated clothing. Clothing was worn as full coverage (long sleeves and trousers) and partial coverage (short sleeves and shorts). Residual permethrin on the skin and its effect on mosquitoes was measured using modified WHO cone assays and quantified using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Results In the arm-in-cage assays, unwashed clothing reduced landing by 58.9% (95% CI 49.2–66.9) and biting by 28.5% (95% CI 22.5–34.0), but reduced to 18.5% (95% CI 14.7–22.3) and 11.1% (95% CI 8.5–13.8) respectively after 10 washes. Landing and biting for resistant and susceptible strains was not significantly different (p<0.05). In free-flight room tests, full coverage treated clothing reduced landing by 24.3% (95% CI 17.4–31.7) and biting by 91% (95% CI 82.2–95.9) with partial coverage reducing landing and biting by 26.4% (95% CI 20.3–31.2) and 49.3% (95% CI 42.1–59.1) respectively with coverage type having no significant difference on landing (p<0.05). Residual permethrin was present on the skin in low amounts (0.0041mg/cm2), but still produced a KD of >80% one hour after wearing treated clothing. Conclusion Whilst partially covering the body with permethrin-treated clothing provided some protection against biting, wearing treated clothing with long sleeves and trousers provided the highest form of protection. Washing treated clothing dramatically reduced protection provided. Permethrin-treated clothing could provide protection to individuals from Ae. aegypti that show permethrin resistance. Additionally, it could continue to provide protection even after the clothing has been worn. Field trials are urgently needed to determine whether clothing can protect against dengue and Zika.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectZika Research Projecten_US
dc.subjectZika Virusen_US
dc.subjectDengueen_US
dc.subjectAedes aegyptien_US
dc.titlePersonal Protection of Permethrin-Treated Clothing against Aedes aegypti, the Vector of Dengue and Zika Virus, in the Laboratoryen_US
eihealth.countryOthersen_US
eihealth.categoryEpidemiology and epidemiological studiesen_US
eihealth.typeResearch protocol informationen_US
eihealth.maincategorySave Lives / Salvar Vidasen_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPLoS Oneen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Department of Disease Controlen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversity of Floridaen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameUmea University. Department of Global Health and Epidemiologyen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameNanyang Technological University. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.corporatenameDurham University. School of Biological and Biomedical Sciencesen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record