Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPini, Rodolfo et al.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T16:32:01Z
dc.date.available2020-06-15T16:32:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.024en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12663/1742
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to evaluate the protocol adopted during the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic to maintain elective activity in a vascular surgery unit while minimising the risk of contamination to both patients and physicians, and the impact of this activity on the intensive care (IC) resources. Methods: The activity of a vascular surgery unit was analysed from 8 March to 8 April 2020. Surgical activity was maintained only for acute or elective procedures obeying priority criteria. The preventive screening protocol consisted of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) for all patients and physicians with symptoms and for unprotected contact infected cases, and serological physician evaluations every 15 days. Patients treated in the acute setting were considered theoretically infected and the necessary protective devices were used. The number of patients and the possible infection of physicians were evaluated. The number and type of interventions and the need for post-operative IC during this period were compared with those in the same periods in 2018 and 2019. Results: One hundred and fifty-one interventions were performed, of which 34 (23%) were acute/emergency. The total number of interventions was similar to those performed in the same periods in 2019 and 2018: 150 (33, of which 22% acute/emergency) and 117 (29, 25% acute/emergency), respectively. IC was necessary after 6% (17% in 2019 and 20% in 2018) of elective operations and 33% (11) of acute/emergency interventions. None of the patients treated electively were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection during hospitalisation. Of the 34 patients treated in acute/emergency interventions, five (15%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. It was necessary to screen 14 (47%) vascular surgeons with NPS after contact with infected colleagues, but none for unprotected contact with patients; all were found to be negative on NPS and serological evaluation. Conclusion: A dedicated protocol allowed maintenance of regular elective vascular surgery activity during the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no contamination of patients or physicians and minimal need for IC resources.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_US
dc.subjectInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.subjectPandemicsen_US
dc.subjectVascular Diseasesen_US
dc.titleIs it Possible to Safely Maintain a Regular Vascular Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic?en_US
eihealth.countryOthersen_US
eihealth.categoryClinical characterization and managementen_US
eihealth.categoryHealth systems and servicesen_US
eihealth.typeOther publicationsen_US
eihealth.maincategorySave Lives / Salvar Vidasen_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgeryen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record