| dc.contributor.author | Hollander, Judd E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Carr, Brendan G. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-07T17:19:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-05-07T17:19:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-04-30 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2003539 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12663/1366 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Recognizing that patients prioritize convenient and inexpensive care, Duffy and Lee recently asked whether in-person visits should become the second, third, or even last option for meeting patient needs. Previous work has specifically described the potential for using telemedicine in disasters and public health emergencies. No telemedicine program can be created overnight, but U.S. health systems that have already implemented telemedical innovations can leverage them for the response to Covid-19. | en_US |
| dc.language | English | en_US |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Coronavirus | en_US |
| dc.subject | Infectious Diseases | en_US |
| dc.subject | Telemedicine | en_US |
| dc.title | Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19 | en_US |
| eihealth.country | Others | en_US |
| eihealth.category | Health systems and services | en_US |
| eihealth.type | Published Article | en_US |
| eihealth.maincategory | Slow Spread / Reducir la Dispersión | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal | New England Journal of Medicine | en_US |
