Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVillettaz, Patrice
dc.contributor.authorGillieron, Gwladys
dc.contributor.authorKillias, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-22T18:42:57Z
dc.date.available2020-04-22T18:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2015.1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12663/1158
dc.description.abstractThis Campbell systematic review compares effects of custodial and non‐custodial sentences on re‐offending. The authors found 14 high‐quality studies, including three randomised controlled trials and two natural experiments. Imprisonment is no more effective than community‐based sanctions in reducing re‐offending. Despite this evidence, almost all societies across the world continue to use custodial sentences as the main crime control strategy. In terms of rehabilitation, short confinement is not better or worse than “alternative” solutions.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_US
dc.subjectInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.subjectCrimeen_US
dc.subjectPrisonsen_US
dc.titleThe Effects on Re‐offending of Custodial vs. Non‐custodial Sanctions: An Updated Systematic Review of the State of Knowledgeen_US
eihealth.countryOthersen_US
eihealth.categoryPublic Health Interventionsen_US
eihealth.typePublished Articleen_US
eihealth.maincategorySlow Spread / Reducir la Dispersiónen_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalCampbell Systematic Reviewsen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record